Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    27

    Default Genuine Crawford/Dickson or Bison Toolpost/Toolholders Choice.

    In a situation where I can purchase either a Genuine Crawford/Dickson Toolpost/Toolholders or a Bison "Dickson" Toolpost/Toolholders. Which one would you choose?

    Value wise the Bison is 80% that of the Crawford/Dickson. Both look to be great tool sets. The Crawford/Dickson is second hand from their original factory where people talk about the quality being the best and is still in great condition, and the Bison is brand new. The Bison is tempting for the price, but I guess it's a bit romantic perhaps leaning toward the original version, which I'm sure would still last a lifetime or more even though it's second hand.

    Undecided help me out please!

    ...or perhaps I just flip a coin?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Heidelberg, Victoria
    Age
    79
    Posts
    2,074

    Default

    Buy both, check them out in the flesh, then sell the one you don't want to keep

    Ken

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by neksmerj View Post
    Buy both, check them out in the flesh, then sell the one you don't want to keep

    Ken
    The thought has crossed my mind - think I'll do that. Resale should be pretty good.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    6,458

    Default

    BP,

    It might be worthwhile to consider the availability of additional tool holders. If the Bison and the Dickson were identical, then eeny meeny might apply, if they differ I imagine second hand Dickson holders might be more readily and cheaply available than the Polish versions. I have a Swiss version of the Dickson. In the decade that I have owned it I have never seen additional holders on eBay.

    BT

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    near Rockhampton
    Posts
    6,216

    Default

    That is the thing about the dickson and clones. Tool holders are not cheap for the home enthusiast.

    Compared to a Chinese Aloris clone.
    Gold, the colour of choice for the discerning person.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Norwood-ish, Adelaide
    Age
    59
    Posts
    6,542

    Default

    I'd agree - if you have not got the money to buy the necessary tool holders, the Aloris style is so much easier to make yourself (and are also cheaper to buy).
    I worked in a place that used the Dickson style holders and while they had some advantages over the Aloris style at the end of the day I wouldn't rate them as significantly better. I'd make the choice based on how easily I could get extra tool holders - that would be the defining issue for me.

    Michael

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Australia east coast
    Age
    71
    Posts
    2,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .RC. View Post
    That is the thing about the dickson and clones. Tool holders are not cheap for the home enthusiast.

    Compared to a Chinese Aloris clone.
    Agree and I now have 2 Dickson type QCTP's. I've made a bunch of holders for the one on my Chipmaster and it was a right PITA. May make more one day but maybe not, too.

    If I was buying new and money wasn't an object I'd buy a Multifix type every time.

    PDW

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Thanks for the comments. I've taken the plunge with the Crawford to start with. I'm lucky that up front it included a heap of toolholders that will near see me out.


    Nevertheless, what do you guys consider expensive? I personally don't consider 30-45 AUD for a quality "standard" Dickson (incl. Polish Bison actually) toolholder to be expensive. And these are UK made (granted they aren't made by "Crawford"). Particularly when they would most certainly take me more than a couple of hours to make plus materials. Prices this side of the world aren't great I'll admit, I don't like to say it but I barely bother looking at Australian sites these days for small tooling such as this.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Norwood-ish, Adelaide
    Age
    59
    Posts
    6,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bpbuilder View Post
    Nevertheless, what do you guys consider expensive?
    It's probably not the individual cost that I baulk at, but at the thought of paying that for 10, 20 or 30 holders. (I think the record here is someone who made 50 holders for their QCTP). It adds up and usually those prices don't include shipping. I would happily pay $40 (subject to cash flow) for something that makes machining easier or quicker but 10 or 20 times that starts pushing the boundaries. As I have machine tools so I can make things it is much more satisfying if I can make the item myself and save that money for things I can't produce.

    Michael

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael G View Post
    10, 20 or 30 holders. (I think the record here is someone who made 50 holders for their QCTP).
    Wow, 50 toolholders! I’m coming from the very small hobby workshop frame of mind where even 30 toolholders is enormous. For me, I’d never need anywhere near that amount as I never intend to production machine to that extent. Certainly if you needed a large amount then that would be expensive.

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael G View Post
    As I have machine tools so I can make things it is much more satisfying if I can make the item myself and save that money for things I can't produce.
    Completely agree, I’ve lost sight a bit in regard to this in recent times, seem to be spending so much time on these type of jobs and not on other “real” (lack of a better word) jobs. Yes very satisfying.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Mt Pleasant SA
    Posts
    126

    Default

    I'd expect the Bison to be better than the Dickson in durability terms. I discovered the hard way that Dickson don't temper their toolholders back far enough, preferring just to tell users to 'go easy'. I think the Poles, anyone else, would temper the holders to 45-50 RC where they wouldn't be so brittle. I'm no superman, snapped a clamping 'ledge' as easy as...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Norwood-ish, Adelaide
    Age
    59
    Posts
    6,542

    Default

    Someone did it...
    MAKING QC TOOL HOLDERS | Model Engineer

    Michael

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Australia east coast
    Age
    71
    Posts
    2,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael G View Post
    Someone did it...
    MAKING QC TOOL HOLDERS | Model Engineer

    Michael
    *I'VE* done it.

    I didn't ever say it couldn't be done, I said it was a PITA to do (compared with the Aloris type holders).

    IIRC I used a shaper, vertical mill & horizontal mill in the process. I could do the Aloris type on a vertical mill alone in 1/4 of the time and a lot less care & attention WRT tolerances.

    PDW

Similar Threads

  1. Dickson Toolpost Brochure
    By Anorak Bob in forum METALWORK GENERAL
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29th Nov 2011, 02:01 PM
  2. N.S.W. genuine profax hd 4m mig gun
    By kwappa in forum METALWORK - Machinery, Equipment, MARKET
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20th Mar 2011, 03:09 PM
  3. BISON 4" chuck
    By rev in forum METALWORK GENERAL
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23rd Jul 2010, 10:16 PM
  4. Genuine UNIMAT 3 lathe
    By neksmerj in forum METALWORK GENERAL
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 4th Jun 2007, 08:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •